IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

New Dominant Economic Logic And Its Impact On European Level. An Econometric Approach

Listed author(s):
  • Isabella-Cristiana, SIMA


    (“Constantin Brâncoveanu” University, Romania)

  • Camelia-Aurelia, MARIN

    (“Constantin Brâncoveanu” University, Romania)

Registered author(s):

    The world is changing; a new dominant economic logic appears. What we can see now is that this change doesn’t seem to come from economic leaders, it comes from emergent economies like BRICS Group or the “4 Asian Tigers”. The European Union economic links with those groups are more and more obvious, so this thesis wants to be an analysis of how those dominant logical changes influence the European Union economy. In this way, we made an analysis of statistic dates and an econometric analysis using multiple regressions. The research results are that turbulences on the world great economic market, - like it was expected – have repercussions on the economic development of the European Union, but with a good strategy and politics this could stay in the ranking of the great economic powers in the future.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by Constantin Brancoveanu University in its journal Management Strategies Journal.

    Volume (Year): 22 (2013)
    Issue (Month): Special ()
    Pages: 48-54

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:brc:journl:v:23:y:2013:i:s:p:48-54
    Contact details of provider: Phone: 004-0248-221098
    Web page:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:brc:journl:v:23:y:2013:i:s:p:48-54. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dan MICUDA)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.