IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/zfbrbw/v28y2016i6p362-387n4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Securities Market Design and Stock Market Segments for Small Company Shares: Empirical Evidence from Initial Public Offerings in Germany

Author

Listed:
  • Bessler Wolfgang
  • Schneck Colin

Abstract

In 1997 the “Neuer Markt” was opened as a stock market segment for small companies in Germany and initially performed well by attracting 329 initial public offerings (IPOs). It was closed in 2003 and listed companies were forced to transfer to either the higher ranked “Prime Standard” or to the lower ranked “General Standard”. We analyze the valuation effects of these “new economy” IPOs and whether the segment transfer decision could have been predicted with information that was available at the time of the IPO. Companies are more likely to change to the higher ranked Prime Standard if they are larger, more profitable, and have more growth opportunities. Firms that switch to the lower ranked General Standard improved the subsequent performance, suggesting that they are now traded on a market segment that better matches the firm characteristics with the listing requirements. Hence, designing different market segments that fit best with the heterogeneous characteristics of small companies are one avenue for convincing more companies to go public. Insight from this study may help with regard to establishing efficient and successful securities market segments for small company shares, which currently is intensively debated in many countries. Interestingly, Deutsche Börse announced another re-segmentation on November 21, 2016. This includes the closing of the Entry Standard and the opening of a new market segment for SMEs and growth companies on March 1, 2017.

Suggested Citation

  • Bessler Wolfgang & Schneck Colin, 2016. "Securities Market Design and Stock Market Segments for Small Company Shares: Empirical Evidence from Initial Public Offerings in Germany," Zeitschrift für Bankrecht und Bankwirtschaft (ZBB) / Journal of Banking Law and Banking (JBB), RWS Verlag, vol. 28(6), pages 362-387, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:zfbrbw:v:28:y:2016:i:6:p:362-387:n:4
    DOI: 10.15375/zbb-2016-0604
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.15375/zbb-2016-0604
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.15375/zbb-2016-0604?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:zfbrbw:v:28:y:2016:i:6:p:362-387:n:4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.