IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/zfbrbw/v28y2016i5p342-353n6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

SREP capital ratios and due process

Author

Listed:
  • Schuster Gunnar
  • Pitz Sebastian

Abstract

The introduction of the Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM) and the resulting transfer of prudential bank supervisory competences to the European Central Bank (ECB) has led to material changes in the European financial supervisory landscape. One of the ECB’s key supervisory tools is the supervisory review and evaluation process (SREP). On the basis of the outcome of this process, the ECB requires significant credit institutions to hold additional own funds. This article describes and analyses the ECB’s handling of this significant regulatory tool and identifies weaknesses in applicable due process requirements.

Suggested Citation

  • Schuster Gunnar & Pitz Sebastian, 2016. "SREP capital ratios and due process," Zeitschrift für Bankrecht und Bankwirtschaft (ZBB) / Journal of Banking Law and Banking (JBB), RWS Verlag, vol. 28(5), pages 342-353, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:zfbrbw:v:28:y:2016:i:5:p:342-353:n:6
    DOI: 10.15375/zbb-2016-0506
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.15375/zbb-2016-0506
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.15375/zbb-2016-0506?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:zfbrbw:v:28:y:2016:i:5:p:342-353:n:6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.