IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/strimo/v40y2023i1-2p21-51n1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Systemic risk models for disjoint and overlapping groups with equilibrium strategies

Author

Listed:
  • Feng Yichen
  • Ichiba Tomoyuki

    (Department of Statistics and Applied Probability, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA)

  • Fouque Jean-Pierre

    (Department of Statistics and Applied Probability, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA)

  • Hu Ruimeng

    (Department of Mathematics, Department of Statistics and Applied Probability, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA)

Abstract

We analyze the systemic risk for disjoint and overlapping groups of financial institutions by proposing new models with realistic game features. Specifically, we generalize the systemic risk measure proposed in [F. Biagini, J.-P. Fouque, M. Frittelli and T. Meyer-Brandis, On fairness of systemic risk measures, Finance Stoch. 24 (2020), 2, 513–564] by allowing individual banks to choose their preferred groups instead of being assigned to certain groups. We introduce the concept of Nash equilibrium for these new models, and analyze the optimal solution under Gaussian distribution of the risk factor. We also provide an explicit solution for the risk allocation of the individual banks and study the existence and uniqueness of Nash equilibrium both theoretically and numerically. The developed numerical algorithm can simulate scenarios of equilibrium, and we apply it to study the banking structure with real data and show the validity of the proposed model.

Suggested Citation

  • Feng Yichen & Ichiba Tomoyuki & Fouque Jean-Pierre & Hu Ruimeng, 2023. "Systemic risk models for disjoint and overlapping groups with equilibrium strategies," Statistics & Risk Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 40(1-2), pages 21-51, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:strimo:v:40:y:2023:i:1-2:p:21-51:n:1
    DOI: 10.1515/strm-2022-0004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/strm-2022-0004
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/strm-2022-0004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Systemic risk; CCPs; grouping; equilibrium; 60A99; 91A06; 91B50; 91G99;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:strimo:v:40:y:2023:i:1-2:p:21-51:n:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.