IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/soeuro/v68y2020i1p44-78n3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

‘Our’ vs. ‘Inherited’ Museums. PiS and Fidesz as Mnemonic Warriors

Author

Listed:
  • Radonić Ljiljana

    (Institute of Culture Studies and Theatre History, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vordere Zollamtsstraße 3, 1030Vienna, Austria)

Abstract

The Polish and the Hungarian governing party, PiS and Fidesz, are mnemonic warriors who had already tried to enforce their memory politics during their first government terms, as their flagship museums, the Warsaw Rising Museum, opened in 2004, and the House of Terror in Budapest, opened in 2002, show. In museums they ‘inherited’ from their predecessors, the current governments either change content, as PiS at the Museum of the Second World War in Gdańsk, or ‘only’ battle against the directors in office, as happened at the Museum of the History of Polish Jews in Warsaw and at the Holocaust Memorial Center in Budapest. Yet even mnemonic warriors cannot ignore international developments like the ‘universalization of the Holocaust’. As the author shows, the Polish and the Hungarian governments favored opening new museums over changing existing museums identified as ‘Jewish’, including those that explicitly deal with Polish and Hungarian complicity. New museums, like the Ulma Family Museum in southeastern Poland, the House of Fates in Budapest, and the Warsaw Ghetto Museum, focus on rescuers of Jews and uplifting messages of Polish and Hungarian heroism.

Suggested Citation

  • Radonić Ljiljana, 2020. "‘Our’ vs. ‘Inherited’ Museums. PiS and Fidesz as Mnemonic Warriors," Comparative Southeast European Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 68(1), pages 44-78, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:soeuro:v:68:y:2020:i:1:p:44-78:n:3
    DOI: 10.1515/soeu-2020-0003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/soeu-2020-0003
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/soeu-2020-0003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:soeuro:v:68:y:2020:i:1:p:44-78:n:3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.