IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/soeuro/v66y2018i1p45-68n4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Postsocialist Informal Urbanism between Creativity and Power. Notes on Four Projects from Romania

Author

Listed:
  • Văetişi Şerban

    (Babeş-Bolyai University, Faculty of European Studies, 1 Emmanuel de Martonne st., 400090Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

Abstract

The author illustrates squatting, do-it-yourself urbanism, creative re-appropriation of public space, guerrilla gardening, and artistic occupy-type intervention as forms and evolutions of informal urbanism. By interpreting examples observed in two postsocialist Romanian cities the author comments on the thin boundary between informal and authorized urbanism, and between creativity and power; he interrogates also the key matter of access to the city, with its regulations, resources, and potentialities. His perspective implies an empirical and ethnographic approach to informality, which is analysed in the contexts of privatization logics, especially in relation to the reconfiguration of the public and the private which is so specific to postsocialist transformations. The contrast between grass-roots responses and official projects is seen as decisive in understanding strategies of representations, control of resources, and capital accumulation. Additionally the author suggests the relevance of theorizing such postsocialist urban processes in fruitful but critical comparison with other non-Western forms of urbanism, notably postcolonial ones.

Suggested Citation

  • Văetişi Şerban, 2018. "Postsocialist Informal Urbanism between Creativity and Power. Notes on Four Projects from Romania," Comparative Southeast European Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 66(1), pages 45-68, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:soeuro:v:66:y:2018:i:1:p:45-68:n:4
    DOI: 10.1515/soeu-2018-0004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/soeu-2018-0004
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/soeu-2018-0004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:soeuro:v:66:y:2018:i:1:p:45-68:n:4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.