IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/sagmbi/v10y2011i1n41.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Modified Maximum Contrast Method for Unequal Sample Sizes in Pharmacogenomic Studies

Author

Listed:
  • Nagashima Kengo

    (Josai University)

  • Sato Yasunori

    (Harvard School of Public Health)

  • Hamada Chikuma

    (Tokyo University of Science)

Abstract

In pharmacogenomic studies, biomedical researchers commonly analyze the association between genotype and biological response by using the Kruskal-Wallis test or one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) after logarithmic transformation of the obtained data. However, because these methods detect unexpected biological response patterns, the power for detecting the expected pattern is reduced. Previously, we proposed a combination of the maximum contrast method and the permuted modified maximum contrast method for unequal sample size in pharmacogenomic studies. However, we noted that the distribution of the permuted modified maximum contrast statistic depends on nuisance parameter σ2, which is the population variance. In this paper, we propose a modified maximum contrast method with a statistic that does not depend on the nuisance parameter. Furthermore, we compare the performance of these methods via simulation studies. The simulation results showed that the modified maximum contrast method gave the lowest false-positive rate; therefore, this method is powerful for detecting the true response patterns in some conditions. Further, it is faster and more accurate than the permuted modified maximum contrast method. On the basis of these results, we suggest a rule of thumb to select the appropriate method in a given situation.

Suggested Citation

  • Nagashima Kengo & Sato Yasunori & Hamada Chikuma, 2011. "A Modified Maximum Contrast Method for Unequal Sample Sizes in Pharmacogenomic Studies," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 1-25, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:sagmbi:v:10:y:2011:i:1:n:41
    DOI: 10.2202/1544-6115.1560
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2202/1544-6115.1560
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2202/1544-6115.1560?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:sagmbi:v:10:y:2011:i:1:n:41. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.