IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/pepspp/v32y2026i2p159-173n1005.html

The Shadow of Crime: The Effect of Victimization on Perceived Safety and Subjective Well-Being in Europe (2002–2023)

Author

Listed:
  • Bertoli Kimberly

    (School of Economics, Bocconi University, Via Sarfatti, 25 Milano 20136, Italy)

  • Sironi Emiliano

    (Department of Statistical Sciences, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Gemelli, 1 Milano 20123, Italy)

Abstract

This research provides evidence of the multidimensional costs of crime victimization in Europe. Using data from 11 rounds of the European Social Survey (ESS) collected between 2002 and 2023, the study aims to estimate the effect of experienced victimization on two distinct domains of human perception: perceived safety and subjective well-being. The results indicate that crime victimization leads to a significant and enduring reduction in all explored metrics. Furthermore, gender-disaggregated analysis through interaction models reveals a gender-specific impact on perceived safety, which is 47 % larger for women than for men. Finally, the analysis identifies a significant temporal evolution of the consequences of victimization: the subjective well-being penalty associated with being a victim nearly doubled between 2002 and 2023. These findings challenge current policy paradigms that prioritize raw crime reduction over victim recovery and subjective security management.

Suggested Citation

  • Bertoli Kimberly & Sironi Emiliano, 2026. "The Shadow of Crime: The Effect of Victimization on Perceived Safety and Subjective Well-Being in Europe (2002–2023)," Peace Economics, Peace Science, and Public Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 32(2), pages 159-173.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:pepspp:v:32:y:2026:i:2:p:159-173:n:1005
    DOI: 10.1515/peps-2026-0027
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/peps-2026-0027
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/peps-2026-0027?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:pepspp:v:32:y:2026:i:2:p:159-173:n:1005. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyterbrill.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.