IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/nonpfo/v6y2015i1p3-24n3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

When Good Intentions Go Wrong: Immunity under the Volunteer Protection Act

Author

Listed:
  • Groble Patricia

    (Levin College of Urban Affairs, Cleveland State University, Cleveland Ohio 44115, USA)

  • Brudney Jeffrey L.

    (Department of Public and International Affairs, University of North Carolina Wilmington, Wilmington, NC, USA)

Abstract

The Volunteer Protection Act (VPA) was enacted in 1997 to encourage volunteerism by protecting individuals from liability for their negligent actions while volunteering. Proponents intended to provide legal safeguards for volunteers, whom they claimed were deterred from volunteering by fears of liability. Little attention has been paid to this legislation since its enactment, however. This article examines the implementation and interpretation of the VPA through the lens of case law to determine whether the act has had its intended effects for volunteers. Our analysis of all court cases in which the VPA has been cited shows that volunteers are at risk for lawsuits over a variety of actions during the course of their volunteer activities. This analysis also demonstrates that although volunteers can avail themselves of the VPA’s protection, their success in invoking this defense is mixed.

Suggested Citation

  • Groble Patricia & Brudney Jeffrey L., 2015. "When Good Intentions Go Wrong: Immunity under the Volunteer Protection Act," Nonprofit Policy Forum, De Gruyter, vol. 6(1), pages 3-24, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:nonpfo:v:6:y:2015:i:1:p:3-24:n:3
    DOI: 10.1515/npf-2014-0001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/npf-2014-0001
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/npf-2014-0001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:nonpfo:v:6:y:2015:i:1:p:3-24:n:3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.