IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/nonpfo/v16y2025i3p513-540n1006.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Role of Public Education in NGO Advocacy in the Authoritarian Context: A Case Study of Chinese ENGOs

Author

Listed:
  • Mao Wenye

    (13101 Tohoku University , Sendai, Japan)

  • Nishide Yuko

    (13101 Tohoku University , Sendai, Japan)

Abstract

This study examines the role of public education in the advocacy strategies of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) under authoritarian constraints, using Chinese environmental NGOs (ENGOs) as a case. Despite the increasing use of social media, the advocacy function of public education remains underexplored in such contexts. Drawing on content analysis of 2,961 social media posts from 20 ENGOs and 12 in-depth interviews, we find that ENGOs primarily use social media to disseminate information and gain “safe attention,” while largely underutilizing their interactive potential. Public education is viewed as a long-term goal, but is not strategically integrated into broader advocacy efforts due to limited resources and political sensitivity. Building on attention-based advocacy theory, we propose a strategic attention management approach, recommending that NGOs adopt differentiated strategies: community-based education anchored in offline legitimacy for resource-limited organizations, and large-scale, frame-sensitive communication for those with greater capacity. This study contributes to NGO advocacy literature by conceptualizing public education as a form of indirect advocacy and highlighting the need for nuanced attention strategies in authoritarian contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Mao Wenye & Nishide Yuko, 2025. "The Role of Public Education in NGO Advocacy in the Authoritarian Context: A Case Study of Chinese ENGOs," Nonprofit Policy Forum, De Gruyter, vol. 16(3), pages 513-540.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:nonpfo:v:16:y:2025:i:3:p:513-540:n:1006
    DOI: 10.1515/npf-2024-0031
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/npf-2024-0031
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/npf-2024-0031?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:nonpfo:v:16:y:2025:i:3:p:513-540:n:1006. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyterbrill.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.