IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/maneco/v2y2015i1p7-24n6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ideas, Not Interests or Institutions, Caused the Great Enrichment

Author

Listed:
  • McCloskey Deirdre N.

    (University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, USA)

Abstract

The question is why the Great Enrichment of 4,000 or 10,000 percent increase in material scope per person, 1800 to the present, awaited 1800. The answer lies with ideas, ideologies, sociology, habits of lip, conversation, ethics – in short, how people viewed each other. They began rather suddenly in northwestern Europe from 1600 or so to view each other as having liberty and dignity, which is to say the legal ability to have a go and and social honor in doing so. Not that material causes do not matter. But none of material causes are unique to Europe or the modern world – coal was use anciently in China on a large scale, trade was larger in the Indian Ocean than anywhere until the nineteenth century, property rights were fully protected under Roman law, and yet none of these places had a great enrichment. There is nothing unscientific about emphasizing ideas. The unscientific attitude would be to assume, as economists are inclined to do, that only incentives of a straightforwardly Samuelsonian sort can matter. The unscientific attitude characterizes many of a neo-institutionalist tendency.

Suggested Citation

  • McCloskey Deirdre N., 2015. "Ideas, Not Interests or Institutions, Caused the Great Enrichment," Man and the Economy, De Gruyter, vol. 2(1), pages 7-24, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:maneco:v:2:y:2015:i:1:p:7-24:n:6
    DOI: 10.1515/me-2015-0005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/me-2015-0005
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/me-2015-0005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Peter Boettke, 2018. "Economics and Public Administration," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 84(4), pages 938-959, April.
    2. Peter Boettke & Rosolino Candela, 2017. "Comparative Historical Political Economy and the Bourgeois Era," Journal of Private Enterprise, The Association of Private Enterprise Education, vol. 32(Winter 20), pages 13-29.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:maneco:v:2:y:2015:i:1:p:7-24:n:6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.