IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/maneco/v11y2024i2p13-35n1002.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Economic Analysis of Exclusive Contracts

Author

Listed:
  • Chen Xiaofang

    (Associate Professor, School of International Financial Law, East China University of Political Science and Law, Shanghai, China)

  • Liao Zhimin

    (Professor, School of International Financial Law, East China University of Political Science and Law, Shanghai, China)

Abstract

Under Chinese anti-monopoly law, large platforms are forbidden to use exclusive contracts to prevent online shops from doing business with competing platforms. The alleged purpose of the law is to promote competition among the platforms, for it is widely believed that large platforms are able to eliminate competition with exclusive contracts and gain monopoly profits. However, we argue that exclusive contracts are probably used for protecting the investment of the platforms; that the platform, online shops and the competing platforms tend to allocate resources efficiently. If the exclusive contract is used inefficiently, the platform would bear extra costs and its economic strength and competitiveness would be weakened, and the exclusive contract will be difficult to sustain. It is unlikely that platforms with “market dominance” are able to use exclusive contracts to eliminate competition. Cursory banning of exclusive contract could put “freedom of contract” and private property rights at risk.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen Xiaofang & Liao Zhimin, 2024. "An Economic Analysis of Exclusive Contracts," Man and the Economy, De Gruyter, vol. 11(2), pages 13-35.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:maneco:v:11:y:2024:i:2:p:13-35:n:1002
    DOI: 10.1515/me-2024-2008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/me-2024-2008
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/me-2024-2008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:maneco:v:11:y:2024:i:2:p:13-35:n:1002. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyterbrill.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.