Author
Listed:
- Gipson Jr. Ronnie R.
(25977 Penn State Dickinson Law , 150 S. College Street, Carlisle, Pennsylvania, USA, 17013-2861)
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to provide the appropriate policy framework to view the turmoil within which the U.S. economy exists after the start of the second Trump administration utilizing tariffs with no comprehension of their long-term impacts. By highlighting the current economic events and comparing the conditions with the fundamental principles of free trade, the article seeks to provide a convincing case for the complete rejection of isolationist and mercantilist tools. The article demonstrates that free trade between global states leads to increased competition and more efficient production. When the principles of free trade are properly implemented, consumers in the marketplace enjoy a greater variety of better-quality goods at a lower price, which is a win for the consumer. The concept of economic advantage leads to specialization in free trade economies, where a country only produces goods that they are efficient at producing resulting in higher levels of output in quantity and quality. When the principles of free trade are abandoned in favor of mercantilist and nationalist policies, other nations that relied on established free trade agreements seek other trading partners. The resulting impact to the transitioning economy away from free trade is chaotic at best and harmful for all of the economic participants. The first year of the second Trump administration can be best described as chaotic and detrimentally harmful to the United States’ interests and trading partners with no long-term plan for economic revitalization and prosperity.
Suggested Citation
Gipson Jr. Ronnie R., 2026.
"Opportunity Lost,"
The Law and Development Review, De Gruyter, vol. 19(2), pages 625-659.
Handle:
RePEc:bpj:lawdev:v:19:y:2026:i:2:p:625-659:n:1005
DOI: 10.1515/ldr-2025-0092
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:lawdev:v:19:y:2026:i:2:p:625-659:n:1005. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyterbrill.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.