IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/lawdev/v19y2026i1p41-72n1004.html

China’s Global Development Initiative and the 2030 Agenda: Natural Companions or Uncomfortable Bedfellows

Author

Listed:
  • Farrington Francesca

    (1019 University of Aberdeen , Aberdeen)

  • Ramanujam Nandini

    (McGill University, Montreal, Canada)

Abstract

In September 2021, the Chinese government launched the Global Development Initiative (GDI), a program aimed at financing the 2030 Agenda and promoting greener and more sustainable development. This article analyses the compatibility of the GDI with the 2030 Agenda, identifying points of convergence and departure. Despite the GDI’s rhetorical packaging as human-rights based and people-centred, the GDI appears to represent a predominantly needs-based approach to development focused on improving socio-economic wellbeing through targeted poverty alleviation programs. While the GDI is most likely to excel in the area of poverty alleviation, this article cautions that the decoupling of institutions and governance from development may prevent China from translating its investment in material wellbeing into long-run development in states with poor governance and weak institutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Farrington Francesca & Ramanujam Nandini, 2026. "China’s Global Development Initiative and the 2030 Agenda: Natural Companions or Uncomfortable Bedfellows," The Law and Development Review, De Gruyter, vol. 19(1), pages 41-72.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:lawdev:v:19:y:2026:i:1:p:41-72:n:1004
    DOI: 10.1515/ldr-2024-0135
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/ldr-2024-0135
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/ldr-2024-0135?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:lawdev:v:19:y:2026:i:1:p:41-72:n:1004. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyterbrill.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.