IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/lawdev/v19y2026i1p1-40n1001.html

Charting a Functionalist Business-Centred Approach to Sustainable Development Goal 16.3 Through Business-to-Business Arbitration

Author

Listed:
  • Taiwo Dorcas O.

    (Essex Law School, 2591 University of Essex , Wivenhoe Park, Colchester, CO4 3SQ, UK)

Abstract

The aim of this article is to establish a link between business-to-business arbitration and sustainable development, and to demonstrate the potential impact of a functionalist business-centred approach to this relationship. While the United Nations Sustainable Development Agenda 2030 acknowledges the importance of civil access to justice for sustainable development, it does not fully define access to justice, thereby leaving open to interpretation what types of alternative dispute resolution mechanisms Agenda 2030 envisages, and which parties should have access to them. Building on Cappelletti and Garth’s work on waves of access to justice, the article proposes a ‘functionalist business-centred approach’ to access to justice. Using legal functionalism, this article argues for a novel interpretation of access to justice in the sustainable development discourse that would expressly include business-to-business arbitration as a civil justice institution on the premise that without business-to-business arbitration, access to justice as a sustainable development goal as expressed in SDG 16.3 cannot be fully actualised.

Suggested Citation

  • Taiwo Dorcas O., 2026. "Charting a Functionalist Business-Centred Approach to Sustainable Development Goal 16.3 Through Business-to-Business Arbitration," The Law and Development Review, De Gruyter, vol. 19(1), pages 1-40.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:lawdev:v:19:y:2026:i:1:p:1-40:n:1001
    DOI: 10.1515/ldr-2024-0123
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/ldr-2024-0123
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/ldr-2024-0123?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:lawdev:v:19:y:2026:i:1:p:1-40:n:1001. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyterbrill.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.