IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/lawdev/v10y2017i1p1-27n1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Developing Legislation to Formalise Customary Land Management: Deep Legal Pluralism or a Shallow Veneer?

Author

Listed:
  • Farran Sue

    (Department of Law, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland)

  • Corrin Jennifer

    (TC Beirne School of Law, St Lucia, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia)

Abstract

One of the many post-colonial claims of indigenous people is the re-assertion of their rights over their land and its resources. Colonial history has created for many people a plural legal system and this, combined with social and economic changes, presents new challenges for development in the realm of traditional or customary land. This article focuses on the Pacific island state of Vanuatu, formerly known as the New Hebrides. At independence in 1980 allodial title to all land was returned to the custom owners while colonial forms of land law were also retained. In 2013, after nearly a decade of concern about land alienation, the Vanuatu government introduced the Custom Land Management Act. This article critically analyses this attempt to safeguard customary law and customary institutions in formal, written law, considering in particular the implications for law and development in a plural land law regime.

Suggested Citation

  • Farran Sue & Corrin Jennifer, 2017. "Developing Legislation to Formalise Customary Land Management: Deep Legal Pluralism or a Shallow Veneer?," The Law and Development Review, De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 1-27, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:lawdev:v:10:y:2017:i:1:p:1-27:n:1
    DOI: 10.1515/ldr-2016-0017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/ldr-2016-0017
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/ldr-2016-0017?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:lawdev:v:10:y:2017:i:1:p:1-27:n:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.