IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/johsem/v9y2012i2p20n8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examining Factors Contributing to the Development of FEMA-Approved Hazard Mitigation Plans

Author

Listed:
  • Yoon D.K.

    (North Dakota State University - Main Campus)

  • Youngs George A.

    (North Dakota State University - Main Campus)

  • Abe Daiko

    (North Dakota State University - Main Campus)

Abstract

The Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 requires local governments to complete pre-disaster mitigation plans, approved by FEMA, in order to be eligible for certain types of federal funding. Even with this requirement in place, many local jurisdictions in the U.S. have yet to adopt a FEMA-approved multi-hazard mitigation plan. Consequently, the percentage of a state’s population covered by such plans varies substantially from state to state. This study examined staff resources, financial resources, and disaster experience of local governments by state as factors contributing to the development of FEMA-Approved Hazard Mitigation Plans. Indicators of these measures were gleaned from multiple nationwide data sets and each measure’s relative importance was assessed via multiple regression analysis. Two measures of staff resources failed to affect the likelihood of completing approved hazard mitigation plans, while one measure of financial resources (Pre-Disaster Mitigation planning dollars per capita by state) and one measure of disaster experience (number of Presidential Disaster Declaration incidents per capita by state) had significant effects on the percentage of a state’s population covered by approved plans. Implications for promoting the development of local governments’ hazard mitigation plans are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Yoon D.K. & Youngs George A. & Abe Daiko, 2012. "Examining Factors Contributing to the Development of FEMA-Approved Hazard Mitigation Plans," Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, De Gruyter, vol. 9(2), pages 1-20, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:johsem:v:9:y:2012:i:2:p:20:n:8
    DOI: 10.1515/1547-7355.2010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/1547-7355.2010
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/1547-7355.2010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:johsem:v:9:y:2012:i:2:p:20:n:8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.