IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/johsem/v9y2012i2p20n11.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Medical Response Capabilities to a Catastrophic Disaster: "House" or House of Cards?

Author

Listed:
  • Donahue Donald A.

    (University of Maryland University College, American Academy of Disaster Medicine, Diogenec Group)

  • Godwin Evelyn A.

    (Diogenec Group)

  • Cunnion Stephen O.

    (Diogenec Group)

Abstract

Planning for a disaster is often influenced by the dual factors of perception of probabilities and current technology. Response design is built upon assumptions on the size, scope, and severity of the catastrophe. Yet, history documents myriad disasters that far surpassed even the direst predictions. Similarly, response mechanisms build upon what is in use at the time in terms of equipment, transportation, and employment. Current planning factors may prove inadequate to address a disaster of historical proportion. The authors offer a review of significant disasters as a measure of the potential scope of needed medical response and the inherent shortcomings therein. They call for a more comprehensive approach to medical response planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Donahue Donald A. & Godwin Evelyn A. & Cunnion Stephen O., 2012. "Medical Response Capabilities to a Catastrophic Disaster: "House" or House of Cards?," Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, De Gruyter, vol. 9(2), pages 1-20, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:johsem:v:9:y:2012:i:2:p:20:n:11
    DOI: 10.1515/1547-7355.2029
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/1547-7355.2029
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/1547-7355.2029?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:johsem:v:9:y:2012:i:2:p:20:n:11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.