IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/johsem/v9y2012i2p1-22n15.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cybersecurity Policy-Making at the Local Government Level: An Analysis of Threats, Preparedness, and Bureaucratic Roadblocks to Success

Author

Listed:
  • Caruson Kiki

    (Department of Government and International Affairs, University of South Florida, 4202 East Fowler Avenue, SOC 107, Tampa, FL 33620, USA)

  • MacManus Susan A.
  • McPhee Brian D.

    (University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33620, USA)

Abstract

Cybersecurity is a serious and complex problem that is escalating at all levels, yet little research has examined the issue at the local government level. This probative study, based on an extensive e-survey of Florida county officials, focuses on: (1) the incidence of cyber attacks – type, source (internal vs. external), and severity (major, minor); (2) perceived threats to agency operations – internally and externally from utility and telecommunications companies, financial institutions, hospitals, and schools; (3) the current status of cybersecurity planning; (4) the urgency of unmet preparedness-related needs; and (5) the degree to which financial, personnel, and organizational roadblocks have deterred the development of comprehensive cybersecurity plans. Controls are made for agency size and type of position held. The study finds that the knowledge or awareness gap between IT professionals and generalist and specialist public administrators is even wider at the local than at the federal (or state) levels. Preparedness lags because of this knowledge gap. There is little sense of urgency, partially because many non-IT officials have little understanding of newer, more dangerous cyber threats and cyber crime.

Suggested Citation

  • Caruson Kiki & MacManus Susan A. & McPhee Brian D., 2012. "Cybersecurity Policy-Making at the Local Government Level: An Analysis of Threats, Preparedness, and Bureaucratic Roadblocks to Success," Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, De Gruyter, vol. 9(2), pages 1-22, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:johsem:v:9:y:2012:i:2:p:1-22:n:15
    DOI: 10.1515/jhsem-2012-0003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/jhsem-2012-0003
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/jhsem-2012-0003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:johsem:v:9:y:2012:i:2:p:1-22:n:15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.