IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/johsem/v8y2011i1p19n3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Crossing Paths: Trend Analysis and Policy Review of Highway-Rail Grade Crossing Safety

Author

Listed:
  • Schartung Charles T.

    (University of Louisville)

  • Lesales Thierry

    (University of Louisville)

  • Human R. Josh

    (University of Louisville)

  • Simpson David M.

    (University of Louisville)

Abstract

This national-level study of highway-rail crossings and grade-crossing accidents finds significant changes over the last 15 years. Findings include a sizable increase in the number of open highway-rail crossings; a continued decrease in the number of accidents, deaths and injuries at grade crossings since 1996, but an increase in injury and fatality rates; higher number of accidents at gated crossings, though the accident-to-crossing ratio at gated crossings remain low; an overall increase in the rate of accidents involving HAZMAT-carrying vehicles, and a continued high percentage of Amtrak passenger trains involved in accidents and an increase in Amtrak injury and fatality rates. Also, while the federal government continues to take on considerably more regulation and costs, it does so in a difficult policy environment with varying state-level regulation and no clear consensus on the best technology to use given cost considerations. We put forward a two-prong approach: the vertical integration of highway-rail oversight with the Federal government playing a coordinative role and “hotspot” remediation of high-risk crossings.

Suggested Citation

  • Schartung Charles T. & Lesales Thierry & Human R. Josh & Simpson David M., 2011. "Crossing Paths: Trend Analysis and Policy Review of Highway-Rail Grade Crossing Safety," Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, De Gruyter, vol. 8(1), pages 1-19, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:johsem:v:8:y:2011:i:1:p:19:n:3
    DOI: 10.2202/1547-7355.1884
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2202/1547-7355.1884
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2202/1547-7355.1884?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:johsem:v:8:y:2011:i:1:p:19:n:3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.