IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/johsem/v8y2011i1p18n50.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bioterrorism and U.S. Domestic Preparedness: Bureaucratic Fragmentation and American Vulnerability

Author

Listed:
  • Fry-Pierce Christine C.

    (Washington State University)

  • Lenze Paul E.

    (Northern Arizona University)

Abstract

This article takes a closer look at the United States’ domestic preparedness program. Beginning in the mid-1990s, the domestic preparedness program has served as the United States’ disaster response and management option in the case of a biological or chemical weapons attack. In its early years, the program focused solely on chemical weapons, but eventually expanded to cover the threat of biological weapons as well. The program, however, is fragmented, leaving authority in the hands of over a dozen different agencies. This leaves the authorities, capabilities, and resources needed to effectively implement the program divided across multiple bureaucracies. In addition, the program is essentially made up of a series of legislative initiatives, causing it to be desperately uncoordinated. Given this organizational fragmentation, we ask: does the domestic preparedness program really prepare the United States for a biological weapons attack?

Suggested Citation

  • Fry-Pierce Christine C. & Lenze Paul E., 2011. "Bioterrorism and U.S. Domestic Preparedness: Bureaucratic Fragmentation and American Vulnerability," Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, De Gruyter, vol. 8(1), pages 1-18, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:johsem:v:8:y:2011:i:1:p:18:n:50
    DOI: 10.2202/1547-7355.1887
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2202/1547-7355.1887
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2202/1547-7355.1887?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:johsem:v:8:y:2011:i:1:p:18:n:50. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.