IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/johsem/v7y2010i1p26n11.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Leaving Deterrence Behind: War-Fighting and National Cybersecurity

Author

Listed:
  • Harknett Richard J.

    (University of Cincinnati)

  • Callaghan John P.

    (University of Cincinnati)

  • Kauffman Rudi

    (Bluffton University)

Abstract

How should the United States organize itself to deal with the threat of cyberaggression? The initial effort of the Obama Administration, released in May 2009, focuses attention on the organizational and bureaucratic decisionmaking infrastructure necessary for cybersecurity and provides some general guidelines about goals and means. It does not address the more fundamental question of strategic approach. This article suggests the time has come to resolve the core issue of what organizing principle should drive national cybersecurity policy. Specifically, we argue that an offense-defense strategic framework must be adopted to think about and organize against cyber threats in the 21st century. This means that the United States must set aside deterrence--the dominant strategic anchor of the past fifty-plus years--and adopt a full war-fighting posture. What has worked in the nuclear realm, and remains relevant for homeland security against WMD terrorism, will not work in cyberspace.

Suggested Citation

  • Harknett Richard J. & Callaghan John P. & Kauffman Rudi, 2010. "Leaving Deterrence Behind: War-Fighting and National Cybersecurity," Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, De Gruyter, vol. 7(1), pages 1-26, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:johsem:v:7:y:2010:i:1:p:26:n:11
    DOI: 10.2202/1547-7355.1636
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2202/1547-7355.1636
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2202/1547-7355.1636?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:johsem:v:7:y:2010:i:1:p:26:n:11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.