IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/johsem/v7y2010i1p16n40.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Domestic Federal Interagency Planning: Meeting a Homeland Security Need

Author

Listed:
  • Christopher Kenneth E.

    (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services)

  • Frye Deborah E.

    (U.S. Department of Homeland Security)

  • Reissman Stephan G.

    (U.S. Department of Homeland Security)

Abstract

Several reports appealed for an interagency planning capability to enhance preparedness, unify planning, and ensure a well-coordinated domestic federal response to catastrophic incidents. The White House Homeland Security Council's, The Federal Response to Hurricane Katrina: Lesson Learned report suggested an enhanced interagency planning capability was required to address planning limitations at the national level, and called for the development of a federal planning and execution system. To address these recommendations, an interagency planning element called the Incident Management Planning Team (IMPT), was established to provide national contingency and crisis action incident management planning to prevent, protect against, respond to, and recover from natural disasters and terrorist acts. This article discusses domestic federal interagency planning and coordination, and the current domestic federal interagency planning capability for homeland security. The article aims to highlight the accomplishments of the Incident Management Planning Team (IMPT), discuss the tools available to assist domestic federal interagency planning, and articulate the current domestic federal interagency planning process.

Suggested Citation

  • Christopher Kenneth E. & Frye Deborah E. & Reissman Stephan G., 2010. "Domestic Federal Interagency Planning: Meeting a Homeland Security Need," Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, De Gruyter, vol. 7(1), pages 1-16, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:johsem:v:7:y:2010:i:1:p:16:n:40
    DOI: 10.2202/1547-7355.1723
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2202/1547-7355.1723
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2202/1547-7355.1723?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:johsem:v:7:y:2010:i:1:p:16:n:40. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.