IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/johsem/v6y2009i1p18n5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Colonel Blotto in the War on Terror: Implications for Event Frequency

Author

Listed:
  • Powers Michael R

    (Temple University & Tsinghua University)

  • Shen Zhan

    (Shenzhen Ping An Bank)

Abstract

The U.S. private terrorism-insurance market has failed to develop as hoped under the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act (TRIA) of 2002 and the Terrorism Risk Insurance Extension Act (TRIEA) of 2005. The principal reason that terrorism risk is viewed as uninsurable in conventional insurance markets is the great difficulty in predicting both its severity and frequency components. While the insurance industry has made some progress in forecasting loss severities, there has been little research on terrorism loss frequency. In this article, we extend the work of Major (2002) by employing a formal Colonel Blotto game to investigate the frequency of terrorist attacks. In two different constant-sum scenarios - simultaneous multiple attacks and single random attacks - our equilibrium solutions demonstrate that both sides (terrorists and counter-terrorists) will choose to allocate their forces to all targets in proportion to the square roots of the targets' physical volumes. In the case of single random attacks, the equilibrium frequency results are consistent with Woo's (2005) "principle of target substitution," and provide guidance for the pricing of terrorism insurance.

Suggested Citation

  • Powers Michael R & Shen Zhan, 2009. "Colonel Blotto in the War on Terror: Implications for Event Frequency," Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, De Gruyter, vol. 6(1), pages 1-18, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:johsem:v:6:y:2009:i:1:p:18:n:5
    DOI: 10.2202/1547-7355.1435
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2202/1547-7355.1435
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2202/1547-7355.1435?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:johsem:v:6:y:2009:i:1:p:18:n:5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.