IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/johsem/v5y2008i1p26n1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing and Prioritizing Critical Assets for the United States Army with a Modified RFRM Methodology

Author

Listed:
  • Anderson Christopher W.

    (University of Virginia)

  • Barker Kash

    (University of Virginia)

  • Haimes Yacov Y.

    (University of Virginia)

Abstract

This paper provides a methodology to filter and prioritize critical assets of a large and complex organization: the United States Army (the Army). The Army provides an excellent test bed in which to develop such a risk strategy because it relies heavily on both public and private assets to meet a wide variety of missions throughout the world. The Army has developed its own regulation for asset risk management, Army Regulation (AR) 525-26 [Department of the Army (DoA) 2004], in response to Department of Defense directives. Combining the high-level guidance of AR 525-26 with both qualitative and quantitative tools, the modified Risk Filtering, Ranking, and Management (RFRM) methodology provides prioritized assets to decisionmakers for risk management.

Suggested Citation

  • Anderson Christopher W. & Barker Kash & Haimes Yacov Y., 2008. "Assessing and Prioritizing Critical Assets for the United States Army with a Modified RFRM Methodology," Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, De Gruyter, vol. 5(1), pages 1-26, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:johsem:v:5:y:2008:i:1:p:26:n:1
    DOI: 10.2202/1547-7355.1300
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2202/1547-7355.1300
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2202/1547-7355.1300?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:johsem:v:5:y:2008:i:1:p:26:n:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.