IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/johsem/v5y2008i1p22n2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Economic Impacts of Dirty Bomb Attacks on the Los Angeles and Long Beach Ports: Applying the Supply-Driven NIEMO (National Interstate Economic Model)

Author

Listed:
  • Park JiYoung

    (University at Buffalo, State University of New York)

Abstract

As homeland security policy makers seek to funnel scarce resources to the most vulnerable areas, geographic impact studies have become ever more crucial since the events of September 11, 2001. In the sense that the Los Angeles and Long Beach ports are among the largest in the world, service interruptions there would have nation-wide economic impacts. Because foreign and domestic imports are in greater volumes than exports, the interruption of imports should be examined with a supply-side MRIO-type model. Hence, a new supply-side National Interstate Economic Model (NIEMO) yields extra information with important political implications - in addition to the previously estimated demand-side results - because both simulations show that terrorist attacks in one state have significant economic impacts in other states. Especially in the U.S. Senate where political power is evenly distributed among the states, the supply-side and demand-side results could help garner nationwide support for prevention measures in specific places, often distant from the states where the measures are taken.

Suggested Citation

  • Park JiYoung, 2008. "The Economic Impacts of Dirty Bomb Attacks on the Los Angeles and Long Beach Ports: Applying the Supply-Driven NIEMO (National Interstate Economic Model)," Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, De Gruyter, vol. 5(1), pages 1-22, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:johsem:v:5:y:2008:i:1:p:22:n:2
    DOI: 10.2202/1547-7355.1312
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2202/1547-7355.1312
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2202/1547-7355.1312?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:johsem:v:5:y:2008:i:1:p:22:n:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.