IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/johsem/v4y2007i2p8n10.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Post-Strike Attribution--A Political & Scientific Dilemma

Author

Listed:
  • McCreight Robert

    (George Washington University)

  • Supinski Stanley

    (Naval Postgraduate School)

Abstract

Rapidly and positively identifying those responsible for carrying out a terrorist attack is essential for numerous reasons. Primarily, public demand to respond, whether diplomatically or militarily, will be intense, particularly in light of the devastating potential harm wrought by attacks using weapons of mass destruction. Quick identification of culprits and methods of operation may also be essential in preventing further assaults. Furthermore, recent history shows that terrorists who would carry out such an attack are less likely to identify themselves with the potential for immediate and accurate retribution. The need for a reliable, credible and internationally recognized system for post-strike attribution is essential as we continue to face WMD threats from terrorist adversaries. Terrorism is an end in itself, with the ultimate objective not receiving credit, but making headway against the enemy through mass casualties. Taking these factors into consideration, this essay advocates the establishment of a formal process and international standardization for post-strike attribution. Such a process will serve to bring key entities together prior to an event, establish protocols to facilitate attribution decisions, and serve as a terrorism deterrent.

Suggested Citation

  • McCreight Robert & Supinski Stanley, 2007. "Post-Strike Attribution--A Political & Scientific Dilemma," Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, De Gruyter, vol. 4(2), pages 1-8, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:johsem:v:4:y:2007:i:2:p:8:n:10
    DOI: 10.2202/1547-7355.1335
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2202/1547-7355.1335
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2202/1547-7355.1335?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:johsem:v:4:y:2007:i:2:p:8:n:10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.