IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/johsem/v4y2007i2p23n7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Vulnerability of U.S. Cities to Environmental Hazards

Author

Listed:
  • Borden Kevin A.

    (University of South Carolina)

  • Schmidtlein Mathew C.

    (University of South Carolina)

  • Emrich Christopher T.

    (Independent Scholar)

  • Piegorsch Walter W.

    (University of Arizona)

  • Cutter Susan L.

    (University of South Carolina)

Abstract

As cities continue to increase in size, population diversity, and complexity their vulnerability to future disasters will increase as well. This paper explores the variability in vulnerability to natural hazards among the 132 urban areas using three indices of vulnerability: social, built environment, and hazard impact. The paper then examines the relative levels of vulnerability compared to federal UASI funding. The paper demonstrates that vulnerability manifests itself as a place-based regional phenomenon, with the most vulnerable cities located in the eastern half of the U.S. The relative importance of the underlying correlates changes from city to city across the United States with social vulnerability assuming greater importance in the South and Southwest, and built environment vulnerability showing regional primacy as the driving indicator among Northeastern and Midwestern cities. Based on this empirical analysis, New Orleans was the most vulnerable urban area in the U.S. yet received only one percent of the preparedness resources awarded by the federal government.

Suggested Citation

  • Borden Kevin A. & Schmidtlein Mathew C. & Emrich Christopher T. & Piegorsch Walter W. & Cutter Susan L., 2007. "Vulnerability of U.S. Cities to Environmental Hazards," Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, De Gruyter, vol. 4(2), pages 1-23, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:johsem:v:4:y:2007:i:2:p:23:n:7
    DOI: 10.2202/1547-7355.1279
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2202/1547-7355.1279
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2202/1547-7355.1279?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:johsem:v:4:y:2007:i:2:p:23:n:7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.