Author
Listed:
- Spradley Leah
(Vanderbilt University, PhD Candidate, Vanderbilt Center for Environmental Management Studies)
- Abkowitz Mark
(Vanderbilt University, Faculty, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering)
- Clarke James
(Vanderbilt University, Professor of the Practice, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering)
Abstract
Terrorist attacks may involve large-scale systems with multiple points of vulnerability and intervention. For example, chemical and biological terrorist attacks can be targeted at large-scale distribution system, such as those associated with agriculture, meat products, or water. These supply-chain systems can be thought of as having three distinct points of potential contamination: at the source, during processing, or at delivery. Prevention and mitigation strategies can be applied at any of these points. The effectiveness of a risk management program involves the ability to evaluate the trade-offs associated with allocating available resources to mitigation strategies that could be implemented at various points along the supply chain.The paper presents a conceptual model for evaluation the cost-effectiveness of these strategies. Structured as an event tree representing potential contamination entry points at various places in the supply chain, decisions related to where and how resources should be allocated to deterrence, detection and response can be evaluated. This approach focuses on the likelihood of the success of the homeland's actions, rather than on the probability of the terrorists' actions, which can be more difficult to quantify.
Suggested Citation
Spradley Leah & Abkowitz Mark & Clarke James, 2006.
"A Risk Assessment Methodology for Intentional Chemical and Biological Contamination of Distribution Systems,"
Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, De Gruyter, vol. 3(3), pages 1-20, September.
Handle:
RePEc:bpj:johsem:v:3:y:2006:i:3:p:20:n:1
DOI: 10.2202/1547-7355.1199
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:johsem:v:3:y:2006:i:3:p:20:n:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyterbrill.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.