Author
Listed:
- DeVito Marco J.
(Emergency and Disaster Management, School of Continuing Studies (SCS), Georgetown University, 640 Massachusetts Ave NW, Washington, DC 20001, USA)
- Wood Erik
(Emergency and Disaster Management, School of Continuing Studies (SCS), Georgetown University, 640 Massachusetts Ave NW, Washington, DC 20001, USA)
- Frazier Tim
(Emergency and Disaster Management, School of Continuing Studies (SCS), Georgetown University, 640 Massachusetts Ave NW, Washington, DC 20001, USA)
Abstract
There are many recognized use cases for small unmanned aircraft systems (sUAS) in emergency and disaster management, but there are obstacles to the full realization of this technology’s potential. More stringent training and certification requirements for public safety use of sUAS is a crucial step in achieving standardization of operations, a common operational picture, interoperability, increased airspace safety, and public acceptance. The purpose of this study is to move toward standards for public safety sUAS pilot training requirements. This research employs a mixed methods approach to investigate the current state of training requirements and trends in public safety sUAS programs. This included a review of the relevant literature, an analysis of survey data, and a combination of structured and semi-structured interviews. While the literature clearly shows many sUAS emergency management applications, it also identifies dangers that must be mitigated. Synthesizing the literature findings with the survey and interview data resulted in four categories of possible sUAS training standard recommendations: progressive levels of certification, flight time minimums, task-focused practical training, and proficiency demonstrations. These recommendations have both national and international applicability.
Suggested Citation
DeVito Marco J. & Wood Erik & Frazier Tim, 2022.
"Standardization and Interoperability of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems (sUAS) for Disaster Management,"
Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, De Gruyter, vol. 19(2), pages 175-203.
Handle:
RePEc:bpj:johsem:v:19:y:2022:i:2:p:175-203:n:1004
DOI: 10.1515/jhsem-2021-0028
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:johsem:v:19:y:2022:i:2:p:175-203:n:1004. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyterbrill.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.