IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/jbwige/v53y2012i2p239-249n10.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Wrong opinions of Dead Men? On the relevance of the history of economic thought for modern economics – A plea for the history of economic thought

Author

Listed:
  • Pierenkemper Toni

    (Münster, Deutschland)

Abstract

Over the last 250 years economic thinking has undergone considerable changes. This article gives a brief overview of major developments and their respective representations within this scientific field. It then elaborates on the fact that the development of these different opinions – or approaches – is mainly due to changing historical circumstances. Economists try to solve contemporary problems; their aims, objects, and methods vary accordingly. However, this does not affect the relevance traditional approaches might have for modern economics. They can indeed prove to be very helpful in tackling today’s economic problems, if economists manage to adjust them to actual circumstances. Within the history of economic thought those traditional concepts are preserved and assembled to enable contemporary scientists to learn from the past.

Suggested Citation

  • Pierenkemper Toni, 2012. "Wrong opinions of Dead Men? On the relevance of the history of economic thought for modern economics – A plea for the history of economic thought," Jahrbuch für Wirtschaftsgeschichte / Economic History Yearbook, De Gruyter, vol. 53(2), pages 239-249, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:jbwige:v:53:y:2012:i:2:p:239-249:n:10
    DOI: 10.1524/jbwg.2012.0021
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1524/jbwg.2012.0021
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1524/jbwg.2012.0021?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:jbwige:v:53:y:2012:i:2:p:239-249:n:10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.