IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/jbwige/v50y2009i2p169-192n18.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Getauschte Arbeit. Das Konzept des Arbeitsmarktes in dogmenhistorischer Perspektive

Author

Listed:
  • Tilly Stephanie

Abstract

The emergence of an industrial labor market is an important dimension of structural change in the 19th and 20th century western world. The paper describes how the labor market has been modeled in economic theory from classical liberalism through neo-classicism up to the New Institutional Economics and evaluates the fruitfulness of these theoretical schools for historical analysis. The examination of the changes in how economic theory has treated the exchange of labor in markets suggests that the separation of the once-integral subject of national economy into theory and history was accompanied by a fading concern for the institutional framework of labor market processes. It argues that this lack of institutional foundation has widened the gap between economic and historical approaches and led to an artificial vision of labor markets which is not appropriate for historical-empirical questions. In the author’s view, meaningful empirical findings in this field call for a theoretical framework for labor market analysis that is institutionally sensitive. The paper concludes that this goal can best be achieved by refashioning the theory-kit according to the postulates laid down in the New Institutional Economics.

Suggested Citation

  • Tilly Stephanie, 2009. "Getauschte Arbeit. Das Konzept des Arbeitsmarktes in dogmenhistorischer Perspektive," Jahrbuch für Wirtschaftsgeschichte / Economic History Yearbook, De Gruyter, vol. 50(2), pages 169-192, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:jbwige:v:50:y:2009:i:2:p:169-192:n:18
    DOI: 10.1524/jbwg.2009.50.2.169
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1524/jbwg.2009.50.2.169
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1524/jbwg.2009.50.2.169?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:jbwige:v:50:y:2009:i:2:p:169-192:n:18. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.