IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/ijbist/v9y2013i1p14n7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Detecting Differential Gene Expression in Subgroups of a Disease Population

Author

Listed:
  • Emerson Sarah C.

    (Department of Statistics, Oregon State University, 44 Kidder Hall, Corvallis, OR 97330, USA)

  • Emerson Scott S.

    (Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA)

Abstract

In many disease settings, it is likely that only a subset of the disease population will exhibit certain genetic or phenotypic differences from the healthy population. Therefore, when seeking to identify genes or other explanatory factors that might be related to the disease state, we might expect a mixture distribution of the variable of interest in the disease group. A number of methods have been proposed for performing tests to identify situations for which only a subgroup of samples or patients exhibit differential expression levels. Our discussion here focuses on how inattention to standard statistical theory can lead to approaches that exhibit some serious drawbacks. We present and discuss several approaches motivated by theoretical derivations and compare to an ad hoc approach based upon identification of outliers. We find that the outlier-sum statistic proposed by Tibshirani and Hastie offers little benefit over a t-test even in the most idealized scenarios and suffers from a number of limitations including difficulty of calibration, lack of robustness to underlying distributions, high false positive rates owing to its asymmetric treatment of groups, and poor power or discriminatory ability under many alternatives.

Suggested Citation

  • Emerson Sarah C. & Emerson Scott S., 2013. "Detecting Differential Gene Expression in Subgroups of a Disease Population," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 9(1), pages 1-14, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:ijbist:v:9:y:2013:i:1:p:14:n:7
    DOI: 10.1515/ijb-2013-0010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/ijb-2013-0010
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/ijb-2013-0010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:ijbist:v:9:y:2013:i:1:p:14:n:7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.