IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/ijbist/v18y2022i2p613-625n1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparison of joint dichotomization and single dichotomization of interacting variables to discriminate a disease outcome

Author

Listed:
  • Nelson Sybil Prince

    (Department of Mathematics, Washington and Lee University, 204 W Washington St, Lexington, VA 24450, USA)

  • Ramakrishnan Viswanathan
  • Nietert Paul
  • Wolf Bethany

    (Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of, South Carolina)

  • Kamen Diane
  • Ramos Paula

    (Department of Medicine, Medical University of, South Carolina)

Abstract

Dichotomization is often used on clinical and diagnostic settings to simplify interpretation. For example, a person with systolic and diastolic blood pressure above 140 over 90 may be prescribed medication. Blood pressure as well as other factors such as age and cholesterol and their interactions may lead to increased risk of certain diseases. When using a dichotomized variable to determine a diagnosis, if the interactions with other variables are not considered, then an incorrect threshold for the continuous variable may be selected. In this paper, we compare single dichotomization with joint dichotomization; the process of simultaneously optimizing cutpoints for multiple variables. A simulation study shows that simultaneous dichotomization of continuous variables is more accurate in recovering both ‘true’ thresholds given they exist.

Suggested Citation

  • Nelson Sybil Prince & Ramakrishnan Viswanathan & Nietert Paul & Wolf Bethany & Kamen Diane & Ramos Paula, 2022. "A comparison of joint dichotomization and single dichotomization of interacting variables to discriminate a disease outcome," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 18(2), pages 613-625, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:ijbist:v:18:y:2022:i:2:p:613-625:n:1
    DOI: 10.1515/ijb-2021-0071
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/ijb-2021-0071
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/ijb-2021-0071?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:ijbist:v:18:y:2022:i:2:p:613-625:n:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.