IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/ijbist/v18y2022i1p73-82n5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Power prior for borrowing the real-world data in bioequivalence test with a parallel design

Author

Listed:
  • Huang Lei
  • Su Liwen
  • Zheng Yuling
  • Chen Yuanyuan
  • Yan Fangrong

    (Research Center of Biostatistics and Computational Pharmacy, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, 210009, China)

Abstract

Recently, real-world study has attracted wide attention for drug development. In bioequivalence study, the reference drug often has been marketed for many years and accumulated abundant real-world data. It is therefore appealing to incorporate these data in the design to improve trial efficiency. In this paper, we propose a Bayesian method to include real-world data of the reference drug in a current bioequivalence trial, with the aim to increase the power of analysis and reduce sample size for long half-life drugs. We adopt the power prior method for incorporating real-world data and use the average bioequivalence posterior probability to evaluate the bioequivalence between the test drug and the reference drug. Simulations were conducted to investigate the performance of the proposed method in different scenarios. The simulation results show that the proposed design has higher power than the traditional design without borrowing real-world data, while controlling the type I error. Moreover, the proposed method saves sample size and reduces costs for the trial.

Suggested Citation

  • Huang Lei & Su Liwen & Zheng Yuling & Chen Yuanyuan & Yan Fangrong, 2022. "Power prior for borrowing the real-world data in bioequivalence test with a parallel design," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 18(1), pages 73-82, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:ijbist:v:18:y:2022:i:1:p:73-82:n:5
    DOI: 10.1515/ijb-2020-0119
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/ijb-2020-0119
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/ijb-2020-0119?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:ijbist:v:18:y:2022:i:1:p:73-82:n:5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.