IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/ijbist/v16y2020i1p15n7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bayesian Two-Stage Adaptive Design in Bioequivalence

Author

Listed:
  • Liu Shengjie
  • Gao Jun
  • Zheng Yuling
  • Huang Lei
  • Yan Fangrong

    (Research Center of Biostatistics and Computational Pharmacy, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing210009, P.R. China)

Abstract

Bioequivalence (BE) studies are an integral component of new drug development process, and play an important role in approval and marketing of generic drug products. However, existing design and evaluation methods are basically under the framework of frequentist theory, while few implements Bayesian ideas. Based on the bioequivalence predictive probability model and sample re-estimation strategy, we propose a new Bayesian two-stage adaptive design and explore its application in bioequivalence testing. The new design differs from existing two-stage design (such as Potvin’s method B, C) in the following aspects. First, it not only incorporates historical information and expert information, but further combines experimental data flexibly to aid decision-making. Secondly, its sample re-estimation strategy is based on the ratio of the information in interim analysis to total information, which is simpler in calculation than the Potvin’s method. Simulation results manifested that the two-stage design can be combined with various stop boundary functions, and the results are different. Moreover, the proposed method saves sample size compared to the Potvin’s method under the conditions that type I error rate is below 0.05 and statistical power reaches 80 %.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu Shengjie & Gao Jun & Zheng Yuling & Huang Lei & Yan Fangrong, 2020. "Bayesian Two-Stage Adaptive Design in Bioequivalence," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 16(1), pages 1-15, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:ijbist:v:16:y:2020:i:1:p:15:n:7
    DOI: 10.1515/ijb-2018-0105
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/ijb-2018-0105
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/ijb-2018-0105?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:ijbist:v:16:y:2020:i:1:p:15:n:7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.