Author
Listed:
- Yi Grace Y.
(Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, CanadaN2L 3G1)
- Yan Ying
(Department of Statistical Science, School of Mathematics, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China)
- Liao Xiaomei
(Departments of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02115, USA)
- Spiegelman Donna
(Departments of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Department of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT 06510)
Abstract
Measurement error and misclassification have long been a concern in many fields, including medicine, administrative health care data, epidemiology, and survey sampling. It is known that measurement error and misclassification may seriously degrade the quality of estimation and inference, and should be avoided whenever possible. However, in practice, it is inevitable that measurements contain error for a variety of reasons. It is thus necessary to develop statistical strategies to cope with this issue. Although many inference methods have been proposed in the literature to address mis-measurement effects, some important issues remain unexplored. Typically, it is generally unclear how the available methods may perform relative to each other. In this paper, capitalizing on the unique feature of discrete variables, we consider settings with misclassified binary covariates and investigate issues concerning covariate misclassification; our development parallels available strategies for handling measurement error in continuous covariates. Under a unified framework, we examine a number of valid inferential procedures for practical settings where a validation study, either internal or external, is available besides a main study. Furthermore, we compare the relative performance of these methods and make practical recommendations.
Suggested Citation
Yi Grace Y. & Yan Ying & Liao Xiaomei & Spiegelman Donna, 2019.
"Parametric Regression Analysis with Covariate Misclassification in Main Study/Validation Study Designs,"
The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 15(1), pages 1-24, May.
Handle:
RePEc:bpj:ijbist:v:15:y:2019:i:1:p:24:n:1
DOI: 10.1515/ijb-2017-0002
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:ijbist:v:15:y:2019:i:1:p:24:n:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.