IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/eucflr/v9y2012i2p156-178n4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The ECB’s Controversial Securities Market Programme (SMP) and its role in relation to the modified EFSF and the future ESM

Author

Listed:
  • Sester Peter

    (Peter Sester, Dr. jur. (Heidelberg), Dr. rer. pol. (Humboldt Berlin) is professor of business law at the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology where he is the director of the Institute of Business and Information Law. Since 2003, he is also honorary professor at the University of Freiburg. In addition, he has been a visiting professor at the University St. Gallen (2011), the Universidad Argentina de la Empresa in Buenos Aires (regularly since 2004), Universidad de Santiago (2010, 2012), Insper in Sao Paulo (2009, 2010), COPPEAD/UFRJ in Rio de Janeiro (2011, 2012) and Fondacao Getulio Vargas in Rio de Janeiro (2006/2007/2011/2012). He is specialized in business and banking law as well comparative legal and economic studies (particularly Brazil).)

Abstract

The article analyzes how the role of the European Central Bank (ECB) has developed throughout the sovereign debt crisis. The author concludes that the ECB acted, so far, within the limits of its competences. However, he recognizes that this judgment is built on a rather “aggressive” interpretation of the TFEU and the statute of the ECB. The author is very sceptical that the existence of the modified EFSF and ESM will allow the ECB to stop buying sovereign bonds in secondary markets. He outlines the structure of a potential future Fiscal Union including Eurobonds.

Suggested Citation

  • Sester Peter, 2012. "The ECB’s Controversial Securities Market Programme (SMP) and its role in relation to the modified EFSF and the future ESM," European Company and Financial Law Review, De Gruyter, vol. 9(2), pages 156-178, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:eucflr:v:9:y:2012:i:2:p:156-178:n:4
    DOI: 10.1515/ecfr-2012-0156
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/ecfr-2012-0156
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/ecfr-2012-0156?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:eucflr:v:9:y:2012:i:2:p:156-178:n:4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.