IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/eucflr/v7y2010i3p414-443n2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The right of companies to cross-border conversion under the TFEU Rules on Freedom of Establishment

Author

Listed:
  • Szydło Marek

    (*Ph.D. (Dr. Habil.), Professor at University of Wroclaw, Poland.)

Abstract

In Cartesio the ECJ treats the cross-border conversion as the process that in the light of Treaty rules on free movement not necessarily must be permitted by the Member State of destination. The Court's stance may be explained by the fact that it considers the legal rules concerning conversion as issued by the Member State of destination as being situated outside the scope of application of the Treaty rules on freedom of establishment, because – according to the Court – they concern merely the preliminary question with regard to the freedom of establishment (i.e. the qualification of a given entity as a company within the meaning of Article 54 TFEU), and not the question of restriction on the freedom of establishment of the company concerned. The present article questions such an assumption, arguing that it is based on incorrect interpretation of Article 54 TFEU. However, if the Court's position in Cartesio is to be maintained, then the realization of cross-border conversion within the EU will be strongly hindered. As the result, the much awaited (and currently still not adopted) Fourteenth Directive turns out to be the necessary prerequisite of effectuating the cross-border conversions in practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Szydło Marek, 2010. "The right of companies to cross-border conversion under the TFEU Rules on Freedom of Establishment," European Company and Financial Law Review, De Gruyter, vol. 7(3), pages 414-443, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:eucflr:v:7:y:2010:i:3:p:414-443:n:2
    DOI: 10.1515/ecfr.2010.414
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/ecfr.2010.414
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/ecfr.2010.414?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:eucflr:v:7:y:2010:i:3:p:414-443:n:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.