IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/eucflr/v7y2010i1p63-80n4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Appraisal Regime of Contributions in Kind in the Light of Amendments to the Second EEC Directive

Author

Listed:
  • Notari Mario

    (*Professor of Company Law at the University of Brescia, Italy.)

Abstract

The new art. 10a of the Second EEC Directive regarding the incorporation of public companies and the maintenance and alteration of their capital provides for three cases where it is possible to contribute assets as a consideration in kind without requiring the report drawn up by an expert “appointed or approved by an administrative or judicial authority” as required by the “old” art. 10 of the Second Directive. The amendment of the Directive is not mandatory and has been adopted only by some of the Member States. This article examines the two “general” derogations of art. 10 of the Second Directive, based on another appraisal already available or on values reported in statutory accounts. Doubts are raised on both the rules approved by EC lawmakers: the first because it ends up replacing, with fewer safeguards, the “ordinary” system for the assessment of the value of contributions in kind, which is definitively left with a merely residual function; the second because it is not consistent with the options given to Member States on the adoption of international accounting standards, making any “fair value” entered in the statutory accounts always and unconditionally attributable to share capital, even after an extensive period of time, the only safeguard being provided in this case by a subsequent control check by directors.

Suggested Citation

  • Notari Mario, 2010. "The Appraisal Regime of Contributions in Kind in the Light of Amendments to the Second EEC Directive," European Company and Financial Law Review, De Gruyter, vol. 7(1), pages 63-80, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:eucflr:v:7:y:2010:i:1:p:63-80:n:4
    DOI: 10.1515/ecfr.2010.63
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/ecfr.2010.63
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/ecfr.2010.63?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:eucflr:v:7:y:2010:i:1:p:63-80:n:4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.