IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/eucflr/v21y2024i5-6p636-670n1004.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Governance of ESG Ratings and Benchmarks (Infomediaries) as Gatekeepers: Exit, Voice and Coercion

Author

Listed:
  • Ramos Muñoz David

    (Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Private Law, Calle Madrid, 126, 28903 GetafeSpain)

  • Smoleńska Agnieszka

    (Institute of Law Studies (Polish Academy of Sciences)/CETEx, London School of Economics, l. Nowy Świat 72 (Pałac Staszica), 00-330 WarsawPoland)

Abstract

636Given the complexity of sustainability issues in finance, ESG financial market information intermediaries have emerged as a way to overcome asymmetries between firms and investors. These infomediaries offer various types of ESG ratings, scores and benchmarks (indices). Like traditional index funds and credit ratings, ESG infomediaries have a gatekeeper function in the market. However, their role is arguably even more complex given the multi-faceted nature of the “E”, “S” and “G” and the difficulty of processing the vast amounts of information supplied by issuers. In this context, however, greenwashing risks loom large. To fully capture the governance uses of ESG infomediaries, this article develops a framework that differentiates between exit-, voice- and coercion-enabling regulatory instruments. The regulation of ratings and benchmarks may facilitate the “exit” of customers and investors from firms that fall short of ESG credentials through market mechanisms, give “voice” to critical constituencies or introduce mandatory “coercion”. Our analysis identifies the different ways in which existing and developing EU rules shape the supply and demand for ESG financial market infomediaries and explores the “external governance” levers with regard to firm sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Ramos Muñoz David & Smoleńska Agnieszka, 2024. "The Governance of ESG Ratings and Benchmarks (Infomediaries) as Gatekeepers: Exit, Voice and Coercion," European Company and Financial Law Review, De Gruyter, vol. 21(5-6), pages 636-670.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:eucflr:v:21:y:2024:i:5-6:p:636-670:n:1004
    DOI: 10.1515/ecfr-2024-0022
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/ecfr-2024-0022
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/ecfr-2024-0022?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:eucflr:v:21:y:2024:i:5-6:p:636-670:n:1004. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.