IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/eucflr/v17y2020i1p72-98n5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The International Organisation of Securities Commission (IOSCO), Europe, Brexit, and Rethinking Cross-border Regulation: A Call for a World Finance Organisation

Author

Listed:
  • Conac Pierre-Henri

    (Professor of Financial Markets Law at theLuxembourg University of Luxembourg and ECGI Research Member. This article originates from a conference on “The International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) and the new international financial architecture: what role for IOSCO in the development and implementation of cross-border regulation and equivalence?” which was held in Luxembourg on the 5th of 0ctober 2018. The conference was co-organised by Professor Pierre-Henri Conac (University of Luxembourg) and Professor Hélène Ruiz-Fabri (Director of the Max Planck Institute, Luxembourg) with the support of the Luxembourg Fonds National de la Recherche and the Chamber of Commerce. Speakers and panelists came from academia, industry, supervisory authorities and IOSCO. According to its General Secretary, Paul Andrews, it was the first international academic conference to discuss the role and future of IOSCO.Luxembourg)

Abstract

The need to promote cross-border regulation and cooperation between supervisors of financial markets has become acute ten years after the 2008 global financial crisis. This is due to a rise in extra-territorial legislation and cross-border access to foreign markets conditioned on “equivalence” and “deference” among jurisdictions. Brexit has made the issue more critical in Europe because the United Kingdom will rely on “equivalence” decisions on many aspects of its future cross-border financial relationships with the European Union. Equivalence decisions by the European Commission are based on a technical assessment but also include a political dimension which can punish or reward the other party. It is not just a European issue since the financial world will be more connected in the next twenty years and will need to rely even more on cross-border cooperation and equivalence. In addition, the amount of bilateral equivalence assessments and decisions could very quickly become unmanageable with dozens of jurisdictions dealing with hundreds of various regimes. The global financial architecture needs to be adapted, market fragmentation to be pre-empted, and international standards to become more granular. The International Organisation of Securities Commission (IOSCO), made up of all securities supervisors in the world, should play a leading role in cross-border regulation and deference. It is the interest of many Europeans countries, and not just the European Union, to be the driving force to strengthen IOSCO so that a more rule-based and cooperative system can prevail and prevent future market fragmentation. For this goal to be achieved, IOSCO should become a new treaty-based World Finance Organisation.

Suggested Citation

  • Conac Pierre-Henri, 2020. "The International Organisation of Securities Commission (IOSCO), Europe, Brexit, and Rethinking Cross-border Regulation: A Call for a World Finance Organisation," European Company and Financial Law Review, De Gruyter, vol. 17(1), pages 72-98, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:eucflr:v:17:y:2020:i:1:p:72-98:n:5
    DOI: 10.1515/ecfr-2020-0005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/ecfr-2020-0005
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/ecfr-2020-0005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:eucflr:v:17:y:2020:i:1:p:72-98:n:5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.