IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/eucflr/v16y2019i4p484-534n3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dealing with Corporate Scandal under European Market Abuse Law: The Case of VW

Author

Listed:
  • Hössl-Neumann Mario

    (Associate at EY Law.Austria)

  • Baumgartner Andreas

    (Assistant Professor (post-doc) at the University of Vienna School of LawThe authors wish to thank the editors of the Stanford Law School TTLF EU Law Working Paper Series, the editors of the Oxford Business Law Blog and two anonymous referees for their invaluable comments. The views of the authors as well as all mistakes are entirely their own.Austria)

Abstract

This paper uses the current proceedings against Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft for violations of its continuous disclosure obligation as a backdrop for addressing fundamental questions of European market abuse law. Specifically, we ask how the Market Abuse Directive and Regulation (MAD/R) and Member State corporate law together shape management’s disclosure policy vis-à-vis the stock market. Taking the perspective of German stock corporation law, our main findings are twofold: First, while European market abuse law severely limits management’s discretion when market integrity is at stake, Member States can still largely control its influence on internal corporate governance – i.e., on the distribution of information between management and shareholders. Second, MAD and MAR directly draw on conceptions of public interest in Member State law when determining the outer bounds of issuers’ ability to delay disclosure, thereby potentially promoting compliance. Based on these insights, the paper then closes with a note of caution for national legislators and suggests a more profound discussion of their responsibility for the optimal functioning of European market abuse law.

Suggested Citation

  • Hössl-Neumann Mario & Baumgartner Andreas, 2019. "Dealing with Corporate Scandal under European Market Abuse Law: The Case of VW," European Company and Financial Law Review, De Gruyter, vol. 16(4), pages 484-534, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:eucflr:v:16:y:2019:i:4:p:484-534:n:3
    DOI: 10.1515/ecfr-2019-0017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/ecfr-2019-0017
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/ecfr-2019-0017?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:eucflr:v:16:y:2019:i:4:p:484-534:n:3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.