IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/eucflr/v16y2019i3p349-380n3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The New European Union Framework for Banking Crisis Management: Rules versus Discretion

Author

Listed:
  • Brescia Morra Concetta

    (Professor of EU Financial Law, University of Roma Tre, and vice-chair of the Administrative Board of Review (ABoR) of the Single Supervisory Mechanism of participating EU countries set up by the European Central Bank (ECB). The opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not represent the official policy or position of the ABoR or of the ECB. I wish to thank the following individuals for their very useful comments: Boudewijn Berger, Danny Busch, Stefano Cappiello, Amélie Champsaur, Raffaele D’Ambrosio, Victor De Serière, Christos Hadjiemmauil, Luis Silva Morais, Marino Perassi, Federico Signorini. I am, of course, solely responsible for any remaining errors.RomaItaly)

Abstract

What Tolstoy says about families also applies to banks: sound banks are all alike, but every failing bank fails in its own way. This is the reason why broad discretion is needed to manage banking crises. This paper studies the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive to assess whether it grants the competent authorities enough discretionary powers to deal with banking crises in the most efficient way. The new EU legal framework for banking resolution is marked by a very complex system of rules, with numerous constraints on the discretionary choices of the competent authorities, which could make it difficult to reach the goals underlying the BRRD, i. e., ensuring long term financial and economic stability and reducing the public cost of banking crises.

Suggested Citation

  • Brescia Morra Concetta, 2019. "The New European Union Framework for Banking Crisis Management: Rules versus Discretion," European Company and Financial Law Review, De Gruyter, vol. 16(3), pages 349-380, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:eucflr:v:16:y:2019:i:3:p:349-380:n:3
    DOI: 10.1515/ecfr-2019-0013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/ecfr-2019-0013
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/ecfr-2019-0013?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:eucflr:v:16:y:2019:i:3:p:349-380:n:3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.