IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/eucflr/v15y2018i3p553-584n6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Singapore Story of Injecting US Chapter 11 into the Commonwealth Scheme

Author

Listed:
  • Wee Meng Seng

    (Faculty of Law, Centre for Law & Business, National University of Singapore. I thank Mr Lee Eng Beng (managing partner, Rajah & Tann) and my colleague Hans Tjio for their help in writing the conference paper. The usual caveats apply. I am also grateful to the assistance rendered by the librarians of the C J Koh Law Library, NUS.University of Singapore SingaporeSingapore)

Abstract

Singapore’s scheme of arrangement was very similar to that found in most Commonwealth countries. Over the last two decades the scheme has become a popular de facto debtor in possession regime in Singapore used to restructure the debts, both financial and trading, of insolvent companies. The courts have taken a leading role in this development. This success story has an unexpected twist recently. As part of its strategy to develop Singapore into an international centre for debt restructuring, the Government accepted the recommendations of a law review committee to bring in significant elements of the US Chapter 11: an automatic, wide-ranging moratorium, cross-class cram down, super priority lien and pre-packaged schemes. It will be argued that due to the significant differences between the insolvency laws of Singapore and US and the different conceptual framework of the scheme and Chapter 11, there will be a period of uncertainty or even instability while the courts work out ways to harmonise the two different bodies of law. This bold experiment has relevance beyond Singapore. It has close parallels in UK’s imminent reforms and, to a lesser extent, the European draft directive on restructuring.

Suggested Citation

  • Wee Meng Seng, 2018. "The Singapore Story of Injecting US Chapter 11 into the Commonwealth Scheme," European Company and Financial Law Review, De Gruyter, vol. 15(3), pages 553-584, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:eucflr:v:15:y:2018:i:3:p:553-584:n:6
    DOI: 10.1515/ecfr-2018-0018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/ecfr-2018-0018
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/ecfr-2018-0018?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:eucflr:v:15:y:2018:i:3:p:553-584:n:6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.