IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/erjour/v11y2021i4p17n7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

When Do Start-ups Patent Their Inventions? Evidence from a Broad Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Barrales-Molina Vanesa
  • Riquelme-Medina Marta
  • Llorens-Montes Francisco Javier

    (University of Granada, Granada, Spain)

Abstract

Patents are no longer merely protective; other factors are becoming prominent in explaining when start-ups patent their inventions. This study uses data from 220 start-ups from different industries to evaluate the role of size, location, collaboration partners and financial means in patenting activity. Our results show a quadratic effect of size on patenting likelihood for start-ups, and patenting level reaches a tipping point for medium-sized start-ups. The findings also show that patenting likelihood is higher, regardless of the industry, when: (i) start-ups are located in international clusters or near other start-ups; (ii) start-ups collaborate with specialized research institutes; and (iii) start-ups are financed through crowdfunding campaigns. Location in co-working spaces seems, however, to be associated with lower patenting likelihood. These results help to illustrate the context in which start-ups value patents as protection instruments vs. as strategic resources to achieve other goals, such as reputation, or access to networks or financial capital. Analysing the reasons why start-ups patent is crucial due to the growing relevance these companies gain when they introduce innovations in the current economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Barrales-Molina Vanesa & Riquelme-Medina Marta & Llorens-Montes Francisco Javier, 2021. "When Do Start-ups Patent Their Inventions? Evidence from a Broad Approach," Entrepreneurship Research Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 11(4), pages 1-17, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:erjour:v:11:y:2021:i:4:p:17:n:7
    DOI: 10.1515/erj-2018-0227
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/erj-2018-0227
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/erj-2018-0227?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:erjour:v:11:y:2021:i:4:p:17:n:7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.