IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/ecqcon/v40y2025i1p45-60n1004.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimation of a New Asymmetry Based Process Capability Index 𝐶𝑐 for Gamma Distribution

Author

Listed:
  • Dey Sanku

    (Department of Statistics, St. Anthony’s College, Shillong, India)

  • Saha Mahendra

    (Department of Statistics, 28742 University of Delhi , Delhi, India)

Abstract

In this work, we provide five different classical estimation methods for the gamma distribution and unknown parameters, which are used to estimate the newly constructed process capability index (PCI) C c C_{c} . Next, we use the aforementioned estimation techniques to consider five bootstrap confidence intervals: standard bootstrap (SB), percentile bootstrap (PB), student’s 𝑡 bootstrap (STB), bias-corrected percentile bootstrap (BCPB), and bias-corrected accelerated bootstrap (BCAB). These allow us to construct confidence intervals of the PCI C c C_{c} . Using the suggested techniques of estimate for small, moderate, and large sample sizes, Monte Carlo simulations are run to compare the performances of the bootstrap confidence intervals’ average widths and coverage probabilities. Simulation results indicate that MLE gives the least AW for all BCIs (SB, PB, BCPB, TB, and BCAB) when compared to all other estimation approaches evaluated in this paper. Further, simulation results demonstrate that, for almost all sample sizes and all of the examined estimation approaches, BCAB CI generates smaller AW and larger CP than their counterparts. Finally, for illustrative purposes, three real data sets are analysed.

Suggested Citation

  • Dey Sanku & Saha Mahendra, 2025. "Estimation of a New Asymmetry Based Process Capability Index 𝐶𝑐 for Gamma Distribution," Stochastics and Quality Control, De Gruyter, vol. 40(1), pages 45-60.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:ecqcon:v:40:y:2025:i:1:p:45-60:n:1004
    DOI: 10.1515/eqc-2024-0029
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/eqc-2024-0029
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/eqc-2024-0029?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:ecqcon:v:40:y:2025:i:1:p:45-60:n:1004. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.