IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/ecqcon/v28y2013i2p7n3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of Lower Bounds for the Variance of Unbiased Estimators for some Well-known Families of Distributions

Author

Listed:
  • Nayeban S.

    (Department of Statistics, School of Mathematical Sciences, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, P.O. Box 91775-1159, Mashhad, Iran)

  • Rezaei Roknabadi A. H.

    (Department of Statistics, School of Mathematical Sciences, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, P.O. Box 91775-1159, Mashhad, Iran)

  • Mohtashami Borzadaran G. R.

    (Department of Statistics, School of Mathematical Sciences, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, P.O. Box 91775-1159, Mashhad, Iran)

Abstract

One of the most fundamental issues in estimation theory about accuracy of an unbiased estimator is computing or approximating its variance. Very often, the variance has a complicated form or cannot be computed explicitly. In this paper, we consider two well-known lower bounds for the variance of unbiased estimator, namely the Bhattacharyya (1946, 1947) and the Kshirsagar (2000) bounds for some versatile families of distributions in statistics and especially in reliability analysis. We consider the generalized gamma (GG), inverse Gaussian, Burr type XII and Burr type III distributions, and derive for these distributions, general forms of Bhattacharyya and Kshirsagar matrices. Additionally, we evaluate different Bhattacharyya and Kshirsagar bounds for the variance of estimators of some functions of relevant parameters and arrive at proposal which of the bounds should be used in given situations.

Suggested Citation

  • Nayeban S. & Rezaei Roknabadi A. H. & Mohtashami Borzadaran G. R., 2013. "Comparison of Lower Bounds for the Variance of Unbiased Estimators for some Well-known Families of Distributions," Stochastics and Quality Control, De Gruyter, vol. 28(2), pages 1-7, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:ecqcon:v:28:y:2013:i:2:p:7:n:3
    DOI: 10.1515/eqc-2013-0016
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/eqc-2013-0016
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/eqc-2013-0016?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:ecqcon:v:28:y:2013:i:2:p:7:n:3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.