IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/ecqcon/v19y2004i1p121-126n3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Minimum Risk Acceptance Sampling Plans: A Review

Author

Listed:
  • Subramani K.

    (Department of Mathematics, Kumaraguru College of Technology, Coimbatore, 641 006 Tamil Nadu, India)

Abstract

Since the first acceptance sampling plans have been developed almost 80 years ago, a number of selection principles have emerged. The majority of these principles is characterized by the fact that they look upon producer and consumer as two opposing parties. However, in many occasions, e.g., in final inspection, producer and consumer represent the same party and, therefore, the used sampling plan should not make an attempt to discriminate between their interests. In this case the interest is to avoid wrong decisions, i.e., reject product of sufficient quality and accept product of insufficient quality. Thus, the natural objective in these cases is to use the overall risk for a wrong decision as optimization criteria. This is the case with so-called “minimum risks sampling plans”, which are reviewed in this paper so as to make them better known to those responsible for quality control.

Suggested Citation

  • Subramani K., 2004. "Minimum Risk Acceptance Sampling Plans: A Review," Stochastics and Quality Control, De Gruyter, vol. 19(1), pages 121-126, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:ecqcon:v:19:y:2004:i:1:p:121-126:n:3
    DOI: 10.1515/EQC.2004.121
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/EQC.2004.121
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/EQC.2004.121?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:ecqcon:v:19:y:2004:i:1:p:121-126:n:3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.