IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/conjap/v27y2015i2p89-110n1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The nuclear power debate after Fukushima: a text-mining analysis of Japanese newspapers

Author

Listed:
  • Abe Yuki

    (Kumamoto University, Japan)

Abstract

This paper analyzes the debate on nuclear power after the Fukushima accident by using a text-mining approach. Texts are taken from the editorial articles of five major Japanese newspapers, Asahi Shinbun, Mainichi Shinbun, Nikkei Shinbun, Sankei Shinbun and Yomiuri Shinbun. After elucidating their different views on nuclear power policy, including general issues such as radiation risks, renewable energy and lessons from the meltdown, the paper reveals two main strands of arguments. Newspapers in favor of denuclearization appeal to “democratic values.” They advocate public participation in decisions on future energy policy and criticize the closed-off administration of nuclear energy. Meanwhile, pro-nuclear newspapers adopt a “technological nationalistic” stance, claiming that denuclearization will weaken Japan’s superiority in the field of nuclear power technology. In other words, the debate about the nuclear power is not merely about energy supply, but also about the choices facing Japanese society over visions for the future after the events of Fukushima.

Suggested Citation

  • Abe Yuki, 2015. "The nuclear power debate after Fukushima: a text-mining analysis of Japanese newspapers," Contemporary Japan, De Gruyter, vol. 27(2), pages 89-110, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:conjap:v:27:y:2015:i:2:p:89-110:n:1
    DOI: 10.1515/cj-2015-0006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/cj-2015-0006
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/cj-2015-0006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul J. SCALISE, 2013. "Policy Images, Issue Frames, and Technical Realities: Contrasting Views of Japan’s Energy Policy Development," Social Science Japan Journal, University of Tokyo and Oxford University Press, vol. 16(2), pages 301-308.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:conjap:v:27:y:2015:i:2:p:89-110:n:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.